How AP Saved Client $560,000 Through Strategic Programme Changes
AP team saved a client $560,000 in under a year, migrated their affiliate programme to a new technology platform, adjusted their affiliate commission structure, shifted their attribution to an external payout model, and brought on higher-quality affiliates who drive incremental sales for their programme.
Learn how these strategic changes for AP's client not only resulted in $560,000 cost savings but successfully completed the platform migration in just 3 months.
The AP team was able to save Client X far more than projected in just 11 months; and, after one year, the programme saw strong YoY growth.
$560,000 cost savings
Attribution Model Change
Prior to working with Acceleration Partners (AP), Client X hadn’t previously worked with an affiliate programme management agency. Client X sought to change their external attribution model from Last Click to Last to Basket and were unsure about making that transition. After researching potential agencies, they selected AP based on our reputation for helping merchants successfully structure their programmes with the Last to Basket model. Based on initial projections, the AP team expected to save Client X approximately $185,000 through these strategic changes.
A Three-Week Platform Migration
Like any smart company, Client X wanted to be cost-conscious and strategic with their affiliate marketing spend while also ensuring that they only paid for incremental sales in their programme. Our team examined their existing affiliate network technology platform (Network X) and commission structure. We found that Network X offered no alternative payment attributions aside from Last Click. In addition, Client X’s existing commission structure did not complement the brand’s incremental sales goals.
Because AP has established relationships and deep experience with all major affiliate networks and platforms, our team was able to guide Client X through a review of technology platforms from an agnostic perspective. Client X ultimately chose Impact.com, which would easily accommodate the program’s Last to Basket attribution model. Our team also recommended that Client X adjust their commission structures for voucher, deal and content affiliates.
Client X wanted their transition to a new technology platform and attribution model to be as thoughtful and budget conscious as possible. As such, they kept part of their programme and select content and loyalty affiliates on Network X’s affiliate platform. To make it possible for Network X to properly commission these affiliates based on Client X’s new Last to Basket model, Impact.com set up a “post-back” feature. This feature tracks when a link from Network X is clicked so those affiliates responsible for driving them could be properly compensated.
The multi-step approach that the AP team took to partially migrate Client X’s affiliate programme and their affiliates over to the new technology platform made it possible to see how each transition stage (technology platform migration, commission changes, moving from Last Click to Last to Basket) affected their programme’s performance. This allowed the team to take a step back and make adjustments as they went through the process.
As a result of the changes in programme structure, Client X was able to integrate all their channels (affiliate, paid marketing, organic search, email, etc.) through one technology platform. Their Last to Basekt attribution model and payment platform not only monitors affiliate activity, but also shows how affiliates’ activity performs and assists with Client X’s other channels. This allows for the client and the AP team to see where the affiliates enter the sales process and pay them only if they are Last to Basket across all channels.
While migrating a programme and its affiliates to a new platform can be complex and take many months, the AP team was able to accomplish it in just three weeks following platform selection.
Embracing Relationships to Mitigate Challenges
A short-term challenge arose in a significant drop of voucher affiliates from Client X’s programme, which the AP team anticipated. Many voucher affiliates prefer a Last Click model because they are able to benefit from consumers leaving the merchant’s site and finding a voucher before checking out. In a Last to Basket model, voucher affiliates lose that advantage.
To counteract this, the AP team had productive 1:1 conversations with the top voucher affiliates in Client X’s programme, transparently sharing the client’s goals and our commitment to finding creative, mutually beneficial ways to work together under this new attribution model.
While a number of voucher affiliates dropped off, Client X saw a rise in new, high-performing content affiliates joining their program – including travel bloggers – which provided an opportunity to reach new customers.